Filed under: The Pats
There is a story in the Boston Globe today which features Bill Belichick’s and Scott Pioli’s comments regarding the videotaping scandal that dogged the Patriots all of last season and still refuses to go away to this day.
Belichick’s comments on the subject confirmed what I had personally hypothesized about the issue all along, that he had interpreted the NFL’s videotaping rules to mean that the taping of opponents signals from the sideline was legal as long as the tapes were not used during the actual game being played.
The actual rule, as taken from The Boston Globe article, states: “Any use by any club at any time, from the start to the finish of any game in which such club is a participant, of any communications or information-gathering equipment, other than Polaroid-type cameras or field telephones, shall be prohibited, including without limitation videotape machines, telephone tapping, or bugging devices, or any other form of electronic devices that might aid a team during the playing of a game.”
Unfortunately the Globe article did not discuss or disclose Belichick’s thoughts on the memo from the NFL that was given to all 32 teams in 2006 emphasizing that taping was not allowed from the sideline (and various other locations) during games.
Belichick admits in the article that he felt there was a gray area in the videotaping rules, which he misinterpreted. I can only guess that Belichick believed that the information in the NFL’s 2006 memo regarding videotaping locations still fell under the umbrella of his interpretation of the NFL’s videotaping rules and that as long as the video was not being used during the actual game being played, his ass was covered.
Sadly, as we are all well aware, that was not the case.
Overall I thought the Globe article did a great job of allowing us to finally hear some of The Patriots’ side of the story regarding ‘tapegate’, (a term that I loathe by the way,) but I felt that the lack of discussion regarding the NFL’s 2006 memo was a pretty big omission from the article.
Honestly, I am surprised that this videotaping story continues to live on. In my opinion it has been completely and totally overblown. I think the main reason that this story continues to live is because The Patriots don’t give the haters much to latch on to. Except for a few exceptions here and there, members of The Patriots generally stay out of trouble, keep their mouths shut and win a lot of football games. ‘Tapegate’ is a story that Patriots haters have finally been able to sink their teeth into and the haters are acting like a dog that doesn’t want to give up it’s chew-toy. It’s time to let it go. This horse was beaten to death a long time ago.
Yes, there is still the Matt Walsh aspect of the story. We are still waiting to hear what the former video assistant has (or doesn’t have) on the Pats, but at this point, if anything substantial comes of that angle I will truly be surprised.
As I have said before, hate my team all you want. I hated the 49ers in the 80′s and the Cowboys in the 90′s. We’re in good company.
GO PATS
2 Comments
Unfortunately and for unknown reasons, there is a increase of hype and media garbage both before and after many professional games and the media Bovine Scat has reached the waist deep level for the Patriots in the last season.
Comment by Debbie Dolphin February 19, 2008 @ 12:34 pmSpygate has been followed by Spectergate (Senator Arlen Specter, Feb 1) and the current Ramgate ($100 million lawsuit, Feb 15).
If every NFL team was using Video cams on the field to record each other according to the football experts than why is only one team paying the price in the media? And, how many people hate the Patriots due to the Spygate media circus?
Perhaps many fans do hate the winning teams yet, how many other NFL dynasty teams and fans endured a massive media circus?
In addition, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell claims that destroying the “Spygate” tapes was the “right thing to do.” Ironically, Roger Goodell is largely responsible for creating the media circus charade in the public forum. Roger Goodell could have prevented the media circus frenzy by stating a NFL investigation and discipline of any team is a private issue.
I’m sure there are many people that are sick of the Patriots and dislike them for that reason (winning). I fully understand that as I have felt that way about other teams in the past.
Comment by Me February 19, 2008 @ 12:53 pmI’m not saying the Pats did not break a rule but I think it has been overblown. I think the video tape thing gives people something they can point to as a reason for disliking the team other than, ‘I am sick of seeing them win every year’.
I would guess that a lot of people don’t understand the minimal impact of those tapes. The fact that they had no impact on the outcome of games and that punishment was rendered months ago is always a side note.